Greer Donley (University of Pittsburgh - School of Law) recently posted her article, Are Embryos or Fetuses Brain Dead? Implications for the Abortion Debate (full test in PaceLaw Review see link below) on SSRN.  Here is the abstract:

Most state abortion definitions exclude the removal of a dead fetus, attempting to distinguish miscarriage and abortion care.

But what does "dead" mean at the earliest stages of potential life? There is a consensus at the end of life that death not only encompasses the cessation of cardiac activity, but also brain death.

This symposium essay considers whether life can exist before brain life begins and how that might impact the abortion debate. The most rudimentary brain waves cannot be detected in an embryo before roughly the eighth week of pregnancy; the capacity for feeling and consciousness begin much later. If brain life starts at one of these points, one could argue that before that moment, terminating a pregnancy simply removes dead pregnancy tissue and is not an abortion according to state abortion definitions.

This essay considers important critiques of this argument as a legal theory, including that the legal definition of brain death requires "irreversibility," that this strategy could exacerbate fetal personhood efforts, and that this fundamentally philosophical question cannot be resolved by science, particularly in a moment of scientific distrust.

The essay concludes that though the concept of brain life has some moral and rhetorical salience, it should not be pursued as a legal strategy.

CLICK HERE to read more.